Wednesday, 24 April 2013

How to Preventa Cancer


Are you tired of that pesky cancer that's been troubling you in recent weeks?

Have you given up on quack therapies like homeopathy, which promise an effective treatment but which turn out to be nothing but water?

Then you should try Preventa, the new product from Northants-based Blue Gold Ltd.

Preventa is promoted as a treatment for many different kinds of cancer, despite being nothing more than, errr, water!


Preventa sells for the princely sum of £12.77 per bottle - which works out as £919.20 for a "3 month pack". This bargain-basement price doesn't include postage, which is £36 for us Lutonians but a staggering £144 for anyone unfortunate enough to be living in the Scottish town of Paisley.

Why so expensive? Well, you see, Preventa isn't just any ordinary old water. 

No, it is "deuterium-depleted water" or DDW. (Perhaps you'll remember from your post-doctoral chemistry studies that deuterium is a slightly-heavier type of hydrogen which can be found, in relatively small quantities, in all the world's oceans.)

According to the advertiser's website:

"In 1993, HYD [a Hungarian company] discovered a new method to treat patients with cancerous tumours. This new method is the depletion of deuterium in drinking water. Researchers... found that deuterium depleted water inhibits the growth of cancer cells in living organisms, and ultimately causes these cells to die..."

What's more, we're told, the process is completely safe.

"Deuterium depletion is completely safe and innocuous for healthy cells, and there were no adverse reactions or toxic side effects related to deuterium-depleted water during the 18-year-long history of DDW research and its 12-year-long application..."




Interestingly, the claims above are not complete nonsense. There is some research which suggests DDW has potential as a cancer treatment, if not actually killing off cancer cells then at least slowing their growth.

The most important (or, to put it another way, "only") relevant study is a 2010 clinical trial conducted on people with prostate cancer in Hungary. At first glance, it looks like DDW helped to significantly improve their average life expectancy.

A closer examination reveals several problems. The study seems to be rigorous (another way of saying that it's free of obvious methodological flaws). However, it's only what we call a phase 2 trial. New medicines are always subjected to a further, more extensive period of study - called a phase 3 trial - before they're unleashed on the general public.

A second problem is that the 2010 trial is the only such study. Medical research demands that new discoveries should be independently verified and, for a claim that cancer can be cured simply by drinking water, we would expect lots of independent research before handing out the Nobel prizes.


Blue Gold, perhaps sensing an opportunity for gargantuan profits, don't seem to have been able to restrict their marketing appeals to those claims which are actually true.

For instance, we have this nugget:

"'The biological efficacy of the consumption of [DDW] is confirmed by research and clinical investigations. The most significant effect of deuterium depletion is the anti-tumor effect, but it was also proved that regular consumption of Preventa® optimizes the function of the immune system and slows down the processes of aging... The consumption of Preventa®-125 is recommended... as a regular drinking water for diabetic patients...'"

None of the health claims about the immune system, anti-ageing effects or benefits for diabetic people seem to be anything more than wishful thinking - I haven't been able to find a jot of evidence to support them.

There is also a series of rash claims that Preventa can be used to treat mesothelioma, rectum cancer, breast cancer, leukemia, ovarian cancer and lung cancer. The single study mentioned above was restricted to DDW's possible effect on prostate cancer.

We should also bare in mind that Blue Gold apparently lacks the appropriate authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), without which it would be illegal to sell Preventa in the UK.

There's also the trifling matter of the Cancer Act 1939 which would seem to escalate Blue Gold Ltd's business practices to the level of a crime. Anchors away!

"I'm writing to complain about preventawater.com, a website for Blue Gold Ltd. 

The website promotes a product called "Preventa" which is marketed as a treatment for cancer.

1. Preventa is a drinking water product which has been treated to remove deuterium (heavy hydrogen), hence the term "deuterium-depleted water" or DDW.

2. The evidence for DDW as a potential cancer treatment rests mainly on two studies: a 1999 study on mice (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11797936) and a 2010 phase-2 clinical study on prostate cancer in humans (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739263).

3. The website claims: 
(http://store.preventawater.com/)

"In 1993, HYD [a Hungarian company] discovered a new method to treat patients with cancerous tumours. This new method is the depletion of deuterium in drinking water. Researchers at the HYD Company found that deuterium depleted water inhibits the growth of cancer cells in living organisms, and ultimately causes these cells to die. Deuterium depletion is completely safe and innocuous for healthy cells, and there were no adverse reactions or toxic side effects related to deuterium-depleted water during the 18-year-long history of DDW research and its 12-year-long application..."

4. (http://store.preventawater.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=61_62)

"'The biological efficacy of the consumption of [DDW] is confirmed by research and clinical investigations. The most significant effect of deuterium depletion is the anti-tumor effect, but it was also proved that regular consumption of Preventa® optimizes the function of the immune system and slows down the processes of aging... The consumption of Preventa®-125 is recommended... as a regular drinking water for diabetic patients..."

5. The site also contains a series of testimonials: 

(http://store.preventawater.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=65_66)

"My 37-year-old wife was diagnosed with mesothelioma in the pleura... She started consuming Preventa in May 2005 in addition to the chemotherapy.... and today her doctor said: 'I have to tell you something of great consequence, according to your wife’s current CT scan there is not detectable tumor in her body, practically, it has been regressed.'"

6. (http://store.preventawater.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=65_70)

"After the diagnosis of breast cancer in 1988, the first bone metastasis was verified in September 1992. Until the patient started drinking DDW, examinations verified progression, and her pain and disability increased.Following the administration of DDW, her pain subsided within 1–1.5 months, and bone scintigraphy carried out two months later could not verify several small metastases that had earlier been present. The patient consumed Dd-water until January 1994 and noted an improvement in the quality of life..."

7. (http://store.preventawater.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=65_72)

"Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was diagnosed in February 2006... DDW consumption was initiated upon diagnosis. One month later the WBC count started decreasing and by the 7th month of the cure the WBC count reached the physiological level... To sum up, during the last one and a half year of DDW consumption there was a significant improvement in the patient’s condition and not any forms of conventional therapy was applied."

8. On the same page, the site notes:

"The Preventa® deuterium depleted drinking water has not yet been recognised as a medicine..."

9. I'd like to challenge whether the advertisement:

(i) Is misleading because it promotes a treatment for various forms of cancer

(ii) Offers a treatment for conditions for which qualified medical supervision should be sought, which might discourage essential treatment

(iii) Is misleading because it promotes a product which has not been approved by the MHRA as a medicine

(iv) Is misleading because it uses the word 'cure' on several occasions (such as the quote in paragraph 7 above)

10. I'd also like to challenge whether the health claims made can be substantiated, because

(i) The evidence for a treatment for prostate cancer appears to rest on a single phase-2 clinical trial which has apparently never been replicated, nor proceeded to a phase-3 trial

(ii) There appears to be no clinical evidence regarding DDW as a treatment for any other form of cancer in humans

(iii) There appears to be no evidence supporting the claims that Preventa "optimizes the function of the immune system", "slows down the processes of aging" or is helpful for "diabetic patients".

11. Finally, I'd like to challenge whether the testamonial claims for mesothelioma, rectum cancer, breast cancer, leukemia, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer can be substantiated with rigorous clinical evidence."

Saturday, 24 November 2012

Errol Denton's Pretend Petitions


Fearless anti-racism campaigner Errol Denton has been hard at work this past week promoting his new pressure group CARBS (Campaign Against Racist Bloggers).

The group's launch hasn't exactly been a roaring success. Thousands of people were invited to 'like' a Facebook campaign page but, as of today, only a smattering of them have expressed their support.

As reported in an earlier post, Errol's attempts to attract signatures to a mass petition have also faltered. His early efforts, posted on a popular petition website, were repeatedly removed by the site's administrators (presumably for breaking their Terms and Conditions).

A neat solution to this little problem would, of course, be to start your own petitions website. 

Step forward www.thepetition.co.uk !

UPDATE, 28 Nov: Shortly after this article was published, Errol's petition site was taken down. 


The site - which was created on the 14th November, remarkably on the same day that yet another of Errol's petitions had vanished in a puff of smoke - is nothing if not ambitious.

"thepetition.co.uk aims to be the UK’s most respected and influential online petition website... At thepetition.co.uk we harness the power of the internet in a bid to transform society and place this power in the hands of the masses... This public forum is privately sponsored and we reserve the right to refuse submissions. Petitions do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of thepetition.co.uk or our sponsors..."

Like Errol's abortive Facebook campaign, the site has been slow out of the blocks. There are twelve petitions, most of them struggling to attract support:

Nationalise the energy section in Scotland after independence (2 signatures)
Return VAT on Air Ambulance fuel payments (3 signatures)
Give funds for Microarray testing in Wales (2 signatures)
Save the UK Film Council (2 signatures)
Unreasonable increases in Utility prices (2 signatures)
Stop betting shops taking over our high streets (4 signatures)
Support pensions for pre-1975 veterans (2 signatures)
Protection of the Cliffe historic and Archaeological landscape (2 signatures)
Save Our Welsh Cats & Dogs from Death on the Roads (2 signatures)
We are against Westminster City Council’s new parking regulations (2 signatures)
Upgrade the UK Party Political System to a Modular Democracy (2 signatures)

It's interesting to note that, just six hours ago, these eleven petitions had attracted only 6 signatures in the space of 10 days. 

This profound lack of interest among the general public was discussed on Twitter earlier this morning and - hey presto! - the number suddenly swelled to 25 signatures in just five hours.

A suspicious reader might wonder whether some of these petitions were fake, created solely to lend credibility to Errol's own petition (which has attracted 58 signatures).

And they'd be right!


The Westminster Parking Regulations petition has been copied word-for-word from a different petition hosted on a different site.

Nothing suspicious about that - campaign groups routinely cross-post their petitions across many different sites - until you notice that the original petition was closed after its real authors received some happy news.

"Thank you to everyone who signed this petition, I am sure you are all aware that we were victorious in our campaign and the new parking regulations have been rescinded by Westminster City Council."

It's also noticeable that the parking regulations were due to be introduced in 2011 - in other words, the petition was closed at least 12 months ago!

It would seem reasonable to assume, until we hear otherwise, that www.thepetition.co.uk exists solely to promote Errol Denton's bizarre fixation with his critics, and that many of the "petitions" hosted on the site are not genuine.